On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:24 +0000, Martin Fraser wrote: > Dick Middleton wrote: > > > > Philip Hunt wrote: > > > >> I believe this article contains a misunderstanding of the relevant > >> specification (RFC2822). I'll explain why... > > > > Yes indeed but unfortunately this isn't a technical issue it's a > > political issue. > > > > We should have vote. > In the spirit of Freedom that we all adhere to, I'm all for that As I feel "guilty" for provoking this discussion, I'd like to offer an alternative to voting on this. My experience is the majority of lists defaulting to Reply-to: list. Simply put a cautionary note in the .sig appended to list messages that this is not the case. People will still miss it, but less-so. -- Brian McNeil <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil Content of this message in no way represents the opinions or official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its projects.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
This archive is kept by wibble+RM@xxx.xxx.xxx|