[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Edlug Archive May 2004 ]

Re: [edlug] Re: Stallman's talk




Peter G. Hancock wrote:


    > M$ on the other hand does not seem to generate the level of new
    > ideas and developments that one would expect; compare with IBM which
    > is still a power house of original research.

I don't know about that.  Since about 2000, Microsoft's research
groups have become awesome.  (Prior to 2000, it was a different story...)

There are some very innovative things going on there in software model
checking, specification and verification, testing and security,
graphics, and a lot of other areas.  Some of these things have even
begun to percolate into engineering groups.

What is IBM doing that is so impressive?

One often hears of new developments coming out of IBM - there's even been Nobel lauriates - but I've never seen anything about M$; doesn't mean there aren't any. Obviously it's a matter of publicity/perception - I'm very ignorant about both of them really.


I've just had a look at IBM's current project list - there's about 380 projects including the vital: "Veggie Vision" A high-tech version of the bar code scanner that will recognize fruits and vegetables. ;-)

http://domino.research.ibm.com/Comm/wwwr_projects.nsf/projectlist.html?ReadForm&alpha=all&count=2000

The M$ web site shows lots of stuff too - about 160 projects and there's a Pop-quiz (sums up their site (as distinct from the work) really).

http://research.microsoft.com/research/projects/

Dick





-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can find the EdLUG mailing list FAQ list at:
http://www.edlug.org.uk/list_faq.html



This archive is kept by wibble@morpheux.org.DONTSPAMME
homepage