[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Edlug Archive Mar 2004
]
Re: [edlug] Re: Specification != IP?
Peter G. Hancock wrote:
> I can just about see how someone might regard 2 as their property,
or want to keep it secret. But a _statement_?? Isn't that
mind boggling?
It gets worse.
One interpretation of the EU/MS case allows MS to charge a fee for
access to the specifications of the interface.
This would bring in real problems for any of the samba project.
See http://theregister.co.uk/content/4/36520.html
for more details.
Robert.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can find the EdLUG mailing list FAQ list at:
http://www.edlug.org.uk/list_faq.html