[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Edlug Archive Mar 2004 ]

Re: [edlug] Re: Specification != IP?




Peter G. Hancock wrote: > I can just about see how someone might regard 2 as their property,
or want to keep it secret. But a _statement_?? Isn't that mind boggling?

It gets worse.


One interpretation of the EU/MS case allows MS to charge a fee for access to the specifications of the interface.

This would bring in real problems for any of the samba project.

See http://theregister.co.uk/content/4/36520.html
for more details.
	Robert.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can find the EdLUG mailing list FAQ list at:
http://www.edlug.org.uk/list_faq.html



This archive is kept by wibble@morpheux.org.DONTSPAMME
homepage