From: "John Sadler" <jms1@xxx.xxx.xxx>
To: "Ed LUG" <edlug@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Subject: [edlug] Adoption of Open Source.
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:13:36 -0000
Talking to one IT manager about converting to open source he said the
problem was not that it would be advantageous to him.
The problem is most staff are so used to Microsoft that they automatically
do things the Microsoft way and use the idiosyncratic short cuts they have
learnt.
So when presented with a slightly different interface without their
favourite short cuts they were decidedly unhappy.
So the problem is not the performance of open source software, but the
money and time lost in getting staff to use the software.
It would seem if the open source software want to break Microsoft dominance
they are going to have to produce clones in appearance and operation (as
far as the user is concerned.)
You can bet your bottom dollar that anybody who distributes a Microsoft
clone will be perused by the United States in the free world.
So that is the catch 22