[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Edlug Archive Jan 2004 ]

Re: [edlug] Am I being OTT?

To: michael calwell <michael.calwell@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [edlug] Am I being OTT?
From: Steve Kemp <edlug@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 08:59:37 +0000
Cc: EdLUG <edlug@xxx.xxx.xxx>
In-reply-to: <3FF85BA0.4070003@xxx.xxx.xxx>
List-post: <mailto:edlug@xxx.xxx.xxx>
List-subscribe: <mailto:edlug-request@xxx.xxx.xxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:edlug-request@xxx.xxx.xxx>
References: <3FF85BA0.4070003@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Reply-to: Steve Kemp <edlug@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Sender: owner-edlug@xxx.xxx.xxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:29:52PM +0000, michael calwell wrote:

> I ran it through the W3 HTML validator and discovered it lacks a DTD. 
> The W3 validator basically refused it (obviously).

  This is why I think it's essential to have one.

  As you suggest most browser will take it without, but validating it
 is impossible.  That's why they're useful to me.

Steve
--
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can find the EdLUG mailing list FAQ list at:
http://www.edlug.org.uk/list_faq.html

References:
- [edlug] Am I being OTT?
  - From: michael calwell

Prev by Date: [edlug] [OT] laptop battery
Next by Date: Re: [edlug] digital photo database
Previous by thread: [edlug] Am I being OTT?
Next by thread: Re: [edlug] Am I being OTT?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Morpheux

This archive is kept by wibble@morpheux.org.DONTSPAMME

homepage